Biocenosis Of Modiolus Phaseolinus In The Area Before The Kerch Strait Of The Black Sea

BIOCENOSIS OF MODIOLUS PHASEOLINUS IN THE AREA BEFORE THE KERCH STRAIT OF THE BLACK SEA

A.S. Terentijev

Southern Scientific Research Institute of Marine Fisheriesand

and Oceanography (YugNIRO), Kerch, Ukraine

During last decades the Вlack Sea area is under strong antropogenic pressure and as a result of which the degradation of natural ecosystem is observed.

In the present work the YugNIRO\’s data collected during 5 expeditions
1986-90 were used. The benthic sampling were made by "Ocean" and "Petersen" dredgers at the depths range 10-100m. The taxonomic processing was carried out by "The key of the Black - Athov Seas fauna" [1]. During all periods of the investigations 340 stations were carried out at the area 5.3 thousand km2. While calculating the average indices of abundance and biomass were taken. Species stability was expressed by a formula С=100р/P, where p - samples number containing this species, P - general number of samples. Depending on value (С) the following species categories were distinguished: > 50% - constant, 25-50% - additional,

Biocenosis of Modiolus phaseolinus was at the depths > 40m on the phaseolinus silt (mixed with gray silt of phaseolinus shells). In 1986 biocenosis made up 37% of whole area of the Kerch stsait before the Black Sea. There were 45 species of animals in biocenosis composition: 10 - Bivalvia, 3 - Gastropoda, 12 - Polychaeta, 8 - Porifera, 5 - Ascidiacea, 3 - Crustacea, 2 - Echinodermata, Coelenterata and Nemertini by one species (Table 1.).

Ophiuroidea - A. stepanovi, solitary six-rayed coral P. solitarius and polychaeta T. stroemi were typical of the biocenosis. M.I. Kiseljova also

pointed these species as typical ones of this biocenosis [5, 6]. Species richness of the biocenosis decreased with the depth increasing. Much more species were observed at its upper part, where there were many animals, typical of the biocenosis of M. galloprovincialis. This biocenosis was situated much higher. The species richness swiftly degraded till the depth of 70-80m (Fig. 1). At the 70m all species of porifera, crustacea, gastropoda, holothurioidea, many species of polychaeta disappeared. At the depth of 100m only 16 species of animals were observed.

Table 1. The composition and an average level of development of biocenosis of M. phaseolinus in the area of the Kerch Strait before the Black Sea

Species

Average abundance, sp./m2

Average biomass, g/m2

Constant:

Modiolus phaseolinus

Terebellides stroemi

1180,000±250,000

8,200± 1,400

121,000±28,000

0,820± 0,380

Sum

1190,00±250,00

122,000±28,000

Additional:

Amphiura stepanovi

Pachycerianthus solitarius

8,000± 1,700

2,100± 0,540

0,171± 0,045

0,430± 0,110

Sum

10,100± 1,800

0,600± 0,120

Rare:

Abra renieri

Acanthocardia paucicostata

Calyptraea chinensis

Ctenicella appendiculata

Disidea fragilis

Eugira adriatica

Haliclona angulata

Haliclona gracilis

Haliclonissa digitata

Melinna palmata

Modiolus adriaticus

Molgula euprocta

Mycale syrinx

Mytilus galloprovincialis

Nephthys hombergii

Nereis longissima

Notomastus latericeus

Phyllodoce maculata

Pitar rudis

Plagiocardium papilosum

Plagiocardium simile

Stereoderma kirchbergi

Synisoma capito

0,108± 0,077

0,150± 0,110

0,200± 0,160

1,180± 0,290

0,220± 0,140

0,230± 0,140

0,150± 0,110

0,390± 0,210

0,460± 0,370

1,040± 0,320

0,147± 0,083

0,290± 0,150

0,150± 0,110

0,340± 0,250

1,090± 0,350

0,370± 0,170

0,950± 0,160

0,420± 0,180

0,111± 0,079

0,890± 0,830

0,240± 0,140

1,660± 0,520

0,590± 0,320

0,010± 0,007

0,009± 0,006

0,025± 0,019

0,390± 0,130

0,012± 0,007

0,031± 0,021

0,046± 0,043

0,024± 0,015

0,130± 0,100

0,034± 0,013

0,119± 0,069

0,160± 0,120

0,122± 0,098

0,930± 0,820

0,115± 0,049

0,140± 0,110

0,054± 0,018

0,005± 0,004

0,049± 0,036

0,170± 0,160

0,028± 0,017

0,380± 0,110

0,029± 0,013

Sum

11,400± 1,400

3,020± 0,890

Very rare:

Abra nitida, Amphitrite gracilis, Capitella capitata, Cerastoderma glaucum, Ciona intestinalis, Haliclona pallida, Gammarus subtipicus, Nemertini g. sp., Nephthys cirrosa, Nephthys longicornis, Nereis diversicolor, Phyllodoce vittata, Sphaeroma pulchellum, Suberites carnosus, Suberites prototipus, Sycon ciliatum, Tritia reticulata, Trophonopsis breviata

Sum

1,310± 0,360

0,164± 0,065

Total sum

1210,000±250,000

126,000±28,000

Fig. 1. Species richness of biocenosis M. phaseolinus at different depths.

Biomass and abundance of animal benthos had also higher values at upper part of biocenosis (Fig. 2). From 60m till 75m fast decrease of these indices was observed. Some decrease of abundance and animal benthos biomass till 45m of depth, was explained, may be, by competition between M. phaseolinus and M. galloprovincialis.

Fig. 2. Average indices of abundance (a) and biomass (b) of animal benthos of the biocenosis of M. phaseolinus.

The dominant species made up 98% of abundance and 97% of animal benthos biomass. That is why in spite of rather high species richness, species variety of this species turned out very poor. The biocenosis with evident domination of little number of species were called by A.A. Shorygin peaked ones [7]. The biocenosis in question is pronounced peaked. Such biocenosis are easily destroyed with changing conditions of their life.

In trophic structure sestonophages are dominant (Table 2) The organisms collecting detritus from the ground surface as well as carnivora had high species richness. But as to their abundance and biomass, they were rather inferior to sestenophages. The rest of the throphic groups were weakly developed and were presented only in upper part of the biocenosis.

Table. 2. Throphic structure of M. phaseolinus biocenosis

Throphic groupings

Portion (in %) in

Species richness

Abundance

Biomass

Sestonophages

37

97,76

98,02

Collecting detritus from the bottom surface

28

1,64

1,04

Omnivorous eaters of the upper layer of bottom

2

0,14

0,30

Omnivorous eaters of the stratum of bottom

5

0,08

0,04

Carnivore

21

0,34

0,47

Phytophagues

2

0,01

0,01

Polyphagues

5

0,03

0,12

Due to the bottom trawling and soil dumping the investigated biocenosis was stressed by strong antropogenic silting in late eighties. As a result of it the area of biocenosis was decreased 2.3 times, compressing annually on the average 18%. In 1990 the share of biocenosis made up only 16% of the investigated area (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Dynamics M. phaseolinus biocenosis area.

The biocenosis preserved at silted parts of bottom was marked by very poor species richness. There were only 5 species of animals (M. phaseolinus, M. euprocta, N. latericeus, P. solitarius, T. stroemi). The animal benthos abundance was 15 times, biomass 1.6 times lower, than on the phaseolinum silt. The share of the dominant species decreased till 81% of abundance and 88% of zoobenthos biomass (Table 3).

Table 3. The level of the development of M. phaseolinus biocenosis at the different grounds

Type of ground

Number

of types

An average abundance sp./м2

An average biomass g/m2

Index stability (%) by

Dominant species

Abundance

Bio-mass

Portionя (%) by

Index of dominance

Abundance

Bio-mass

Phaseoline silt

45

1256± 91

135±12

37

23

97

89

0,91

Silt

5

84± 4

1± 2

93

80

81

88

0,99

The growing index of stability is connected with simplification of the biocenosis.

While further silting M. phaseolinus biocenosis is transforming into T.stroemi biocenosis.

References

1. Key to the Black - Athov Seas fauna. – Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1968, 1969, 1972. Т. 1, 2, 3. – 437 p., - 536 p., - 340 p.

2. Balogh J. Lebensgemeinschaften der Landtiere. - Berlin, 1958. – 560 s.

3. Bodenheimer F.S. Precis d,ecologie animal. - Paris, 1955. – 315 p.

4. Bykov B.A. Ecological dictionary. - Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1983. - 215 P.

5. Kiseljova M.I. The structure of Modiola phaseolina bottom biocenosis at the southern coast of the Crimea. Macrobenthos//Sea biology № 32. - Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1974. - P. 87-110.

6. Kiseljova M.I. Benthos of soft soils of the Black Sea. - Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1981. – 165 p.

7. Shorygin A.A. About biocenosis//Bull. of MOIP, Т.60, №. 6. – М., 1955. – P. 87-98.



Related articles::

  • Biocenosis Of Intruders Mya Arenaria And Cunearca Cornea (scapharca) In The North-western Azov Sea
  • Impact Of Dredged Grounds Dumping
  • About Necessity Of Small Phyllophora Field Biocenosis (karkinitsky Bay) Protection
  • Ecological Aspects In Functioning Of The Fish Nursery Khtmo In Connection With The Shabolatsky Estuary Ecosystem Restoration
  • Ecological Aspects In Functioning Of The Fish Nursery Khtmo In Connection With The Shabolatsky Estuary Ecosystem Restoration
  • Chronicle Of Exotic Species Introduction
  • Sandy Ground Zoobenthos Of Opuk Nature Preserve
  • Principles And Mechanisms Of The Ecological Protection Of The Azov-black Sea Basin In Ukraine
  • Characteristic Of Azov Sea And Black Sea Coastal Zone In Ukraine As Object Of Management
  • Some Dolphins Observations In The North-western Part Of The Black Sea
  • Zoning Of The North-western Part Of The Black Sea
  • Priorities, Contradictions And Harmonization
  • Ecological And Hygienic Problems Of Disinfection
  • Influence Of Hypoxia On The State Of The Population Of The Black Sea Mussels
  • Ecotourism Development
  • The Black Sea- An Economic Partner
  • Geodynamic Factors Of Formation
  • Formation Of Hydrosulfuric Layer Under Stratificaton Layer
  • Use Of Microbes-indicators As Prognosis Of Extraordinary Ecological Situations (earthquakes)
  • 1oil Terminals Marine Research And Ecological Safety Center Of National Academy Of Science Of Ukraine
  • Environmental Aspects Of Hydrocarbon
  • Hydrology In Stensovsko-zhebriyanski Plavni Practical Management, Danube Delta, Ukraine*
  • Researches Of The Variability Of Some Factors,
  • Functioning Of The Sexual System In The Black Sea Mussels In Conditions Of Anthropogenic Influence
  • Integral Evaluation Of The Trophic Status Of The Danube – Black Sea Water Bodies
  • Possibility For Implementation
  • The Kinetics Of Carbon Oxidation By Oxygen In The Presence Of Carbonates Of Alkaline Metals